[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d09d394f-92d7-420b-b3d4-2eef493d173e@ixit.cz>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 09:44:33 +0100
From: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
To: Ma Ke <make24@...as.ac.cn>, srini@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: wcd937x: Fix error handling in wcd937x
codec driver
On 16/11/2025 07:16, Ma Ke wrote:
> In wcd937x_bind(), the driver calls of_sdw_find_device_by_node() to
> obtain references to RX and TX SoundWire devices, which increment the
> device reference counts. However, the corresponding put_device() are
> missing in both the error paths and the normal unbind path in
> wcd937x_unbind().
>
> Add proper error handling with put_device() calls in all error paths
> of wcd937x_bind() and ensure devices are released in wcd937x_unbind().
>
> Found by code review.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: 772ed12bd04e ("ASoC: codecs: wcdxxxx: use of_sdw_find_device_by_node helper")
> Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make24@...as.ac.cn>
> ---
> sound/soc/codecs/wcd937x.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> @@ -2809,10 +2816,26 @@ static int wcd937x_bind(struct device *dev)
>
> ret = snd_soc_register_component(dev, &soc_codec_dev_wcd937x,
> wcd937x_dais, ARRAY_SIZE(wcd937x_dais));
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Codec registration failed\n");
> + goto err_remove_link3;
> + }
>
> return ret;
> +
> +err_remove_link3:
> + device_link_remove(dev, wcd937x->rxdev);
> +err_remove_link2:
> + device_link_remove(dev, wcd937x->txdev);
> +err_remove_link1:
> + device_link_remove(wcd937x->rxdev, wcd937x->txdev);
> +err_put_txdev:
> + put_device(wcd937x->txdev);
> +err_put_rxdev:
> + put_device(wcd937x->rxdev);
> +err_component_unbind:
> + component_unbind_all(dev, wcd937x);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void wcd937x_unbind(struct device *dev)
> @@ -2825,6 +2848,8 @@ static void wcd937x_unbind(struct device *dev)
> device_link_remove(wcd937x->rxdev, wcd937x->txdev);
> component_unbind_all(dev, wcd937x);
> mutex_destroy(&wcd937x->micb_lock);
> + put_device(wcd937x->txdev);
> + put_device(wcd937x->rxdev);
Shouldn't component_unbind_all be placed here too?
Anyway, current changes (applies with or without the mentioned change):
Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
Thank you!
> }
>
> static const struct component_master_ops wcd937x_comp_ops = {
--
David Heidelberg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists