[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba5db26e-b59d-4074-9436-3e71257fa70f@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 12:37:15 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>, andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, rfoss@...nel.org,
Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, jonas@...boo.se,
jernej.skrabec@...il.com, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch,
lumag@...nel.org, dianders@...omium.org, cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com,
luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, victor.liu@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, l.stach@...gutronix.de, shengjiu.wang@...il.com,
perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] dt-bindings: display: imx: add HDMI PAI for
i.MX8MP
On 21/10/2025 10:02, Simona Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 01:29:55PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
>> Add binding for the i.MX8MP HDMI parallel Audio interface block.
>>
>> The HDMI TX Parallel Audio Interface (HTX_PAI) is a digital module that
>> acts as the bridge between the Audio Subsystem to the HDMI TX Controller.
>> This IP block is found in the HDMI subsystem of the i.MX8MP SoC.
>>
>> Aud2htx module in Audio Subsystem, HDMI PAI module and HDMI TX
>> Controller compose the HDMI audio pipeline.
>>
>> In fsl,imx8mp-hdmi-tx.yaml, add port@2 that is linked to pai_to_hdmi_tx.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> Tested-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
>
> dt patches need an ack from dt maintainers before you push them, please
> make sure you follow that for the next changes.
Huh? Review is an Ack as well. We NEVER give both Rb and Ack. Either Ack
or Review, because Review carries much stronger acceptance.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists