linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: frequency: adf41513: driver implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251116160702.1ac24a54@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 16:07:02 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: rodrigo.alencar@...log.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Andy
 Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Michael
 Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: frequency: adf41513: driver implementation

On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:41:27 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 06:30:38PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 03:44:44PM +0000, Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay wrote:  
> 
> ...
> 
> > In any case, I stopped my review here, you have more than enough to fix.
> > Please, come next time with a tag from one whose name is in the MAINTAINERS.
> > From now on it will be my requirement as a reviewer of IIO subsystem.  
> 
> And to be more clear on this requirement (for all submissions from @analog.com
> and related): A name from approximately below list I want to see as Rb.
> 
> 	Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>
> 	Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>
> 	Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>
>         Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>
> 
> (those people seems experienced and I have heard of / from).
> 

From Nuno's mail seems that in general Analog actually have a better
process for this than many (which is excellent to hear btw!)
RB tags that come before being posted to the list only really have
meaning if we know and have built up trust with the reviewers.
This is different to ones on the list where we can see what the
feedback was that has been acted on.

I'll note that ADI sometimes works with external companies, so
there are various other people who would work as well. Given
that may change over time I'll not call them out explicitly but
you can probably figure out who I mean.  I have no idea if they
also help with pre submission reviews though.

Note that Andy's request here is specific to Analog given they
have the folk to do it.  I don't want this sort of requirement
to apply to folk working for other companies who have a much
smaller presence in IIO!  (just for the record, as Andy was very
clear this was a request specific to Analog).

Jonathan

p.s. Bad luck Rodrigo for being the submitter who triggered this!
Looking forward to v2 - I'll probably not add more noise by
reviewing this version.