[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <421f4746-8d75-227b-6459-bbd82dfd6fa9@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 10:22:34 -0700 (MST)
From: Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>
To: Chen Pei <cp0613@...ux.alibaba.com>
cc: anup@...infault.org, atish.patra@...ux.dev, pjw@...nel.org,
haibo1.xu@...el.com, guoren@...nel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: riscv: Fixed misalignment of CSR related
definitions
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Nov 2025, cp0613@...ux.alibaba.com wrote:
> From: Chen Pei <cp0613@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> The file tools/arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h borrows from
> arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h, and subsequent modifications
> related to CSR should maintain consistency.
Thanks for the patch. A few comments:
> Fixes: 16b0bde9a37c ("RISC-V: KVM: Add perf sampling support for guests")
> Fixes: d1927f64e0e1 ("RISC-V: Fix the typo in Scountovf CSR name")
It seems like this is pushing the definition of "fixes" here. It looks
like the only thing wrong with those patches is that they didn't change
the files under tools/. right? It would have been nice if they had
included the changes to files under tools/, but since the patches don't
introduce any bugs directly, I don't think we should include these Fixes:
lines here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Pei <cp0613@...ux.alibaba.com>
Please, no blank line between the Fixes: headers and the Signed-off-by:.
I've removed the Fixes: lines and the superfluous blank line, and queued
this for v6.18-rc fixes.
- Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists