[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aRoZq2bYYm5MGihy@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 20:36:27 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc: pratyush@...nel.org, jasonmiu@...gle.com, graf@...zon.com,
dmatlack@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, corbet@....net,
rdunlap@...radead.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
kanie@...ux.alibaba.com, ojeda@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
masahiroy@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org,
yoann.congal@...le.fr, mmaurer@...gle.com, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
chenridong@...wei.com, axboe@...nel.dk, mark.rutland@....com,
jannh@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
joel.granados@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
anna.schumaker@...cle.com, song@...nel.org, zhangguopeng@...inos.cn,
linux@...ssschuh.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, rafael@...nel.org, dakr@...nel.org,
bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, yesanishhere@...il.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com,
aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, leon@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, wagi@...nel.org, djeffery@...hat.com,
stuart.w.hayes@...il.com, ptyadav@...zon.de, lennart@...ttering.net,
brauner@...nel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, saeedm@...dia.com,
ajayachandra@...dia.com, jgg@...dia.com, parav@...dia.com,
leonro@...dia.com, witu@...dia.com, hughd@...gle.com,
skhawaja@...gle.com, chrisl@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 22/22] tests/liveupdate: Add in-kernel liveupdate test
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 03:40:53PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 3:24 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 04:03:20PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> > > Introduce an in-kernel test module to validate the core logic of the
> > > Live Update Orchestrator's File-Lifecycle-Bound feature. This
> > > provides a low-level, controlled environment to test FLB registration
> > > and callback invocation without requiring userspace interaction or
> > > actual kexec reboots.
> > >
> > > The test is enabled by the CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE_TEST Kconfig option.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
> > > ---
> > > kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c | 2 +
> > > kernel/liveupdate/luo_internal.h | 8 ++
> > > lib/Kconfig.debug | 23 ++++++
> > > lib/tests/Makefile | 1 +
> > > lib/tests/liveupdate.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 5 files changed, 164 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 lib/tests/liveupdate.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c
> > > index 713069b96278..4c0a75918f3d 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c
> > > @@ -829,6 +829,8 @@ int liveupdate_register_file_handler(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh)
> > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fh->flb_list);
> > > list_add_tail(&fh->list, &luo_file_handler_list);
> > >
> > > + liveupdate_test_register(fh);
> > > +
> >
> > Do it mean that every flb user will be added here?
>
> No, FLB users will use:
>
> liveupdate_register_flb() from various subsystems. This
> liveupdate_test_register() is only to allow kernel test to register
> test-FLBs to every single file-handler for in-kernel testing purpose
> only.
Why the in kernel test cannot liveupdate_register_flb()?
> Pasha
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists