linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] RISC-V: re-enable gcc + rust builds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251116-axis-pouch-419f794cb1cb@spud>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 19:38:07 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Asuna <spriteovo@...il.com>
Cc: Vivian Wang <wangruikang@...as.ac.cn>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	Han Gao <rabenda.cn@...il.com>,
	Jason Montleon <jmontleo@...hat.com>,
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] RISC-V: re-enable gcc + rust builds

On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 10:36:16PM +0800, Asuna wrote:
> Hi everyone. Sorry I was inactive on this patch for a while. I'm getting
> back into this work.
> 
> On 9/19/25 1:20 PM, Vivian Wang wrote:
> > I think instead of testing libclang version, it would make more sense to
> > feature test if bindgen the binary supports these flags, like what we
> > already do with $(cc-option,...).
> > 
> > Same for all the other version tests.
> 
> Conor, since you've reviewed the v3 patch, do you think Vivian's suggestion
> is a better solution? If so, I can start trying to make a v4 patch towards
> that path in the next few days.
> 

I'm okay with either approach, just drop my tag if you decide to use her
suggestion, and I will re-review.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)