[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e617d7b-afd7-465b-b075-32b02257b90b@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 16:11:47 +0100
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] mm: introduce VM_MAYBE_GUARD and make visible in
/proc/$pid/smaps
On 07.11.25 17:11, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> Currently, if a user needs to determine if guard regions are present in a
> range, they have to scan all VMAs (or have knowledge of which ones might
> have guard regions).
>
> Since commit 8e2f2aeb8b48 ("fs/proc/task_mmu: add guard region bit to
> pagemap") and the related commit a516403787e0 ("fs/proc: extend the
> PAGEMAP_SCAN ioctl to report guard regions"), users can use either
> /proc/$pid/pagemap or the PAGEMAP_SCAN functionality to perform this
> operation at a virtual address level.
>
> This is not ideal, and it gives no visibility at a /proc/$pid/smaps level
> that guard regions exist in ranges.
>
> This patch remedies the situation by establishing a new VMA flag,
> VM_MAYBE_GUARD, to indicate that a VMA may contain guard regions (it is
> uncertain because we cannot reasonably determine whether a
> MADV_GUARD_REMOVE call has removed all of the guard regions in a VMA, and
> additionally VMAs may change across merge/split).
>
> We utilise 0x800 for this flag which makes it available to 32-bit
> architectures also, a flag that was previously used by VM_DENYWRITE, which
> was removed in commit 8d0920bde5eb ("mm: remove VM_DENYWRITE") and hasn't
> bee reused yet.
>
> We also update the smaps logic and documentation to identify these VMAs.
>
> Another major use of this functionality is that we can use it to identify
> that we ought to copy page tables on fork.
>
> We do not actually implement usage of this flag in mm/madvise.c yet as we
> need to allow some VMA flags to be applied atomically under mmap/VMA read
> lock in order to avoid the need to acquire a write lock for this purpose.
>
> Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 5 +++--
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 1 +
> include/linux/mm.h | 3 +++
> include/trace/events/mmflags.h | 1 +
> mm/memory.c | 4 ++++
> tools/testing/vma/vma_internal.h | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> index 0b86a8022fa1..8256e857e2d7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> @@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ otherwise.
> kernel flags associated with the particular virtual memory area in two letter
> encoded manner. The codes are the following:
>
> - == =======================================
> + == =============================================================
> rd readable
> wr writeable
> ex executable
> @@ -591,7 +591,8 @@ encoded manner. The codes are the following:
> sl sealed
> lf lock on fault pages
> dp always lazily freeable mapping
> - == =======================================
> + gu maybe contains guard regions (if not set, definitely doesn't)
> + == =============================================================
In general LGTM, BUT in the context of this patch where the flag is
never set, that's not entirely correct ;) It made sense after staring at
patch #5.
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@...nel.org>
--
Cheers
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists