[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251117154415.11041-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 07:44:14 -0800
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
damon@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] mm/damon/vaddr: cleanup using pmd_trans_huge_lock()
On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 07:41:06 -0800 SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Three pmd walk functions in vaddr.c are using pmd_trans_huge() and
> pmd_lock() to handle THPs. Simplify the code by replacing the two
> function calls with a single pmd_trans_huge_lock() call.
>
> Note that this cleanup is not only reducing the lines of code, but also
> simplifies code execution flows for migration entries case, as kindly
> explained [1] by Hugh, who suggested this cleanup.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/296c2b3f-6748-158f-b85d-2952165c0588@google.com
>
> Suggested-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
> ---
> mm/damon/vaddr.c | 48 ++++++++++++------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr.c b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> index 7e834467b2d8..0ad1ce120aa1 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
> @@ -307,24 +307,14 @@ static int damon_mkold_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
> {
> pte_t *pte;
> - pmd_t pmde;
> spinlock_t *ptl;
>
> - if (pmd_trans_huge(pmdp_get(pmd))) {
> - ptl = pmd_lock(walk->mm, pmd);
> - pmde = pmdp_get(pmd);
> -
> - if (!pmd_present(pmde)) {
> - spin_unlock(ptl);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - if (pmd_trans_huge(pmde)) {
> + ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, walk->vma);
> + if (ptl) {
> + if (pmd_present(pmdp_get(pmd)))
> damon_pmdp_mkold(pmd, walk->vma, addr);
> - spin_unlock(ptl);
> - return 0;
> - }
> spin_unlock(ptl);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> pte = pte_offset_map_lock(walk->mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
> @@ -446,21 +436,12 @@ static int damon_young_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> struct damon_young_walk_private *priv = walk->private;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> - if (pmd_trans_huge(pmdp_get(pmd))) {
> - pmd_t pmde;
> -
> - ptl = pmd_lock(walk->mm, pmd);
> - pmde = pmdp_get(pmd);
> + ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, walk->vma);
> + if (ptl) {
> + pmd_t pmde = pmdp_get(pmd);
Kernel test robot reported [1] this is making m68k build fails. Andrew, could
you please add below attaching patch as a fix?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/202511172257.CjElDcRX-lkp@intel.com
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---- >8 ----
>From 0908bba1aec11997107af757a34136a14be619b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 07:36:43 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm/damon/vaddr: provide lvalue to pmd_present()
On m68k, vaddr.c build fails since pmd_present() requires lvalue while
vaddr.c is passing pmdp_get(). Fix it.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511172257.CjElDcRX-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
---
mm/damon/vaddr.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr.c b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
index ef57e95eb422..2750c88e7225 100644
--- a/mm/damon/vaddr.c
+++ b/mm/damon/vaddr.c
@@ -311,7 +311,9 @@ static int damon_mkold_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, walk->vma);
if (ptl) {
- if (pmd_present(pmdp_get(pmd)))
+ pmd_t pmde = pmdp_get(pmd);
+
+ if (pmd_present(pmde))
damon_pmdp_mkold(pmd, walk->vma, addr);
spin_unlock(ptl);
return 0;
--
2.47.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists