[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251117160317.127978-1-ssranevjti@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 21:33:17 +0530
From: ssrane_b23@...vjti.ac.in
To: aahringo@...hat.com,
teigland@...hat.com
Cc: gfs2@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev,
david.hunter.linux@...il.com,
khalid@...nel.org,
Shaurya Rane <ssrane_b23@...vjti.ac.in>
Subject: [PATCH] fs/dlm: use list_add_tail() instead of open-coding list insertion
From: Shaurya Rane <ssrane_b23@...vjti.ac.in>
Replace the manual list pointer manipulation in add_ordered_member()
with the standard list_add_tail() helper. The original code explicitly
updated ->prev and ->next pointers to insert @newlist before @tmp,
which is exactly what list_add_tail(newlist, tmp) provides.
Using the list macro improves readability, removes a source of
potential pointer bugs, and satisfies the existing FIXME requesting
conversion to the list helpers. No functional change in the ordering
logic for DLM members.
Signed-off-by: Shaurya Rane <ssrane_b23@...vjti.ac.in>
---
fs/dlm/member.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/member.c b/fs/dlm/member.c
index c0f557a80a75..c1b5598997b7 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/member.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/member.c
@@ -299,11 +299,7 @@ static void add_ordered_member(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_member *new)
if (!memb)
list_add_tail(newlist, head);
else {
- /* FIXME: can use list macro here */
- newlist->prev = tmp->prev;
- newlist->next = tmp;
- tmp->prev->next = newlist;
- tmp->prev = newlist;
+ list_add_tail(newlist, tmp);
}
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists