[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a90b6b0-bfba-4a25-8fe7-dcb0f3c12acc@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 01:26:24 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>, chao@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
djwong@...nel.org, amir73il@...il.com, joannelkoong@...il.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] erofs: support user-defined fingerprint name
On 2025/11/17 21:25, Hongbo Li wrote:
> From: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> When creating the EROFS image, users can specify the fingerprint name.
> This is to prepare for the upcoming inode page cache share.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/erofs/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++
> fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 6 ++++--
> fs/erofs/internal.h | 2 ++
> fs/erofs/super.c | 5 +++--
> fs/erofs/xattr.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/Kconfig b/fs/erofs/Kconfig
> index d81f3318417d..c88b6d0714a4 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/erofs/Kconfig
> @@ -194,3 +194,12 @@ config EROFS_FS_PCPU_KTHREAD_HIPRI
> at higher priority.
>
> If unsure, say N.
> +
> +config EROFS_FS_PAGE_CACHE_SHARE
> + bool "EROFS page cache share support (experimental)"
> + depends on EROFS_FS && EROFS_FS_XATTR && !EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND
> + help
> + This enables page cache sharing among inodes with identical
> + content fingerprints on the same device.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> index 3d5738f80072..9b9fe1abe0b9 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
> @@ -35,8 +35,9 @@
> #define EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_XATTR_PREFIXES 0x00000040
> #define EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_48BIT 0x00000080
> #define EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_METABOX 0x00000100
> +#define EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ISHARE_KEY 0x00000200
It seems that you didn't address this part I
mentioned in the previous reply:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/a3b0bac9-d08f-44dc-8adb-7cc85cae7b13@linux.alibaba.com
> #define EROFS_ALL_FEATURE_INCOMPAT \
> - ((EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_METABOX << 1) - 1)
> + ((EROFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ISHARE_KEY << 1) - 1)
>
> #define EROFS_SB_EXTSLOT_SIZE 16
>
> @@ -83,7 +84,8 @@ struct erofs_super_block {
> __le32 xattr_prefix_start; /* start of long xattr prefixes */
> __le64 packed_nid; /* nid of the special packed inode */
> __u8 xattr_filter_reserved; /* reserved for xattr name filter */
> - __u8 reserved[3];
> + __u8 ishare_xattr_prefix_id; /* indice the ishare key in prefix xattr */
/* indexes the ishare key in prefix xattres */ ?
> + __u8 reserved[2];
> __le32 build_time; /* seconds added to epoch for mkfs time */
> __le64 rootnid_8b; /* (48BIT on) nid of root directory */
> __le64 reserved2;
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/internal.h b/fs/erofs/internal.h
> index 98fe652aea33..3033252211ba 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/erofs/internal.h
> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ struct erofs_sb_info {
> u32 xattr_blkaddr;
> u32 xattr_prefix_start;
> u8 xattr_prefix_count;
> + u8 ishare_xattr_pfx; /* ishare prefix xattr index */
I think either giving a meaningful comment or just
get rid of the comment entirely.
> struct erofs_xattr_prefix_item *xattr_prefixes;
> unsigned int xattr_filter_reserved;
> #endif
> @@ -234,6 +235,7 @@ EROFS_FEATURE_FUNCS(dedupe, incompat, INCOMPAT_DEDUPE)
> EROFS_FEATURE_FUNCS(xattr_prefixes, incompat, INCOMPAT_XATTR_PREFIXES)
> EROFS_FEATURE_FUNCS(48bit, incompat, INCOMPAT_48BIT)
> EROFS_FEATURE_FUNCS(metabox, incompat, INCOMPAT_METABOX)
> +EROFS_FEATURE_FUNCS(ishare_key, incompat, INCOMPAT_ISHARE_KEY)
> EROFS_FEATURE_FUNCS(sb_chksum, compat, COMPAT_SB_CHKSUM)
> EROFS_FEATURE_FUNCS(xattr_filter, compat, COMPAT_XATTR_FILTER)
> EROFS_FEATURE_FUNCS(shared_ea_in_metabox, compat, COMPAT_SHARED_EA_IN_METABOX)
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
> index 0d88c04684b9..80f032cb2cc3 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ static int erofs_read_superblock(struct super_block *sb)
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> }
> + if (erofs_sb_has_ishare_key(sbi))
> + sbi->ishare_xattr_pfx =
> + dsb->ishare_xattr_prefix_id & EROFS_XATTR_LONG_PREFIX_MASK;
>
> ret = -EINVAL;
> sbi->feature_incompat = le32_to_cpu(dsb->feature_incompat);
> @@ -339,7 +342,6 @@ static int erofs_read_superblock(struct super_block *sb)
> return -EFSCORRUPTED; /* self-loop detection */
> }
> sbi->inos = le64_to_cpu(dsb->inos);
> -
Unnecessary change here.
> sbi->epoch = (s64)le64_to_cpu(dsb->epoch);
> sbi->fixed_nsec = le32_to_cpu(dsb->fixed_nsec);
> super_set_uuid(sb, (void *)dsb->uuid, sizeof(dsb->uuid));
> @@ -737,7 +739,6 @@ static int erofs_fc_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
> err = erofs_xattr_prefixes_init(sb);
> if (err)
> return err;
> -
Unnecessary change here.
> erofs_set_sysfs_name(sb);
> err = erofs_register_sysfs(sb);
> if (err)
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/xattr.c b/fs/erofs/xattr.c
> index 396536d9a862..6cb76313c14c 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/xattr.c
> @@ -519,6 +519,21 @@ int erofs_xattr_prefixes_init(struct super_block *sb)
> }
>
> erofs_put_metabuf(&buf);
> + if (!ret && erofs_sb_has_ishare_key(sbi)) {
> + struct erofs_xattr_long_prefix *new_pfx, *pfx =
> + pfs[sbi->ishare_xattr_pfx].prefix;
struct erofs_xattr_prefix_item *pf = pfs + sbi->ishare_xattr_pfx;
struct erofs_xattr_long_prefix *newpfx;
newpfx = krealloc(pf->prefix,
sizeof(*newpfx) + pf->infix_len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
if (newpfx) {
newpfx->infix[pf->infix_len] = '\0';
pf->prefix = newpfx;
} else {
ret = -ENOMEM;
}
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
> +
> + new_pfx = krealloc(pfx,
> + sizeof(struct erofs_xattr_long_prefix) +
> + pfs[sbi->ishare_xattr_pfx].infix_len + 1,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (new_pfx) {
> + new_pfx->infix[pfs[sbi->ishare_xattr_pfx].infix_len] = '\0';
> + pfs[sbi->ishare_xattr_pfx].prefix = new_pfx;
> + } else {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + }
> sbi->xattr_prefixes = pfs;
> if (ret)
> erofs_xattr_prefixes_cleanup(sb);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists