[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b04531b-64f9-4e42-b43b-bfcfa251b665@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 09:58:33 +0530
From: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski
<brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com,
quic_mrana@...cinc.com, sherry.sun@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PM: sleep: wakeirq: Add support for custom IRQ
flags in dedicated wake IRQ setup
On 11/14/2025 10:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 10:22 AM Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
> <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
>> Some devices require more flexibility when configuring their dedicated
>> wake-up interrupts, such as support for IRQF_SHARED or other IRQ flags.
>> This is particularly useful in PCIe systems where multiple endpoints
>> (e.g., Wi-Fi and Bluetooth controllers) share a common WAKE# signal
>> line which requests platform to re-establish power and reference clocks
>> to the components. In such cases, drivers can use this API with IRQF_SHARED
>> to register a shared wake IRQ handler.
>>
>> Update the internal helper __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq() to accept an
>> irq_flags argument. Modify the existing dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq()
>> and dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq_reverse() to preserve current behavior
>> by passing default flags (IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN).
>>
>> Introduce a new API, dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq_flags(), to allow
>> callers to specify custom IRQ flags. If IRQF_SHARED is used, remove
>> IRQF_NO_AUTOEN and disable the IRQ after setup to prevent spurious wakeups.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> include/linux/pm_wakeirq.h | 6 ++++++
>> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
>> index 8aa28c08b2891f3af490175362cc1a759069bd50..655c28d5fc6850f50fc2ed74c5fbc066a21ae7b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
>> @@ -168,7 +168,8 @@ static irqreturn_t handle_threaded_wake_irq(int irq, void *_wirq)
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> }
>>
>> -static int __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq, unsigned int flag)
>> +static int __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq, unsigned int flag,
>> + unsigned int irq_flags)
>> {
>> struct wake_irq *wirq;
>> int err;
>> @@ -197,8 +198,7 @@ static int __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq, unsigned
>> * so we use a threaded irq.
>> */
>> err = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, handle_threaded_wake_irq,
>> - IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN,
>> - wirq->name, wirq);
>> + irq_flags, wirq->name, wirq);
> It looks like IRQF_ONESHOT will always be there in the flags, so maybe do
>
> + IRQF_ONESHOT | irq_flags, wirq->name, wirq);
>
> here?
>
>> if (err)
>> goto err_free_name;
>>
>> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq, unsigned
>> */
>> int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
>> {
>> - return __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq, 0);
>> + return __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq, 0, IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq);
>>
>> @@ -255,10 +255,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq);
>> */
>> int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq_reverse(struct device *dev, int irq)
>> {
>> - return __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq, WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE);
>> + return __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq, WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE,
>> + IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq_reverse);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq_flags - Request a dedicated wake-up interrupt
>> + * with custom flags
>> + * @dev: Device entry
>> + * @irq: Device wake-up interrupt
>> + * @flags: IRQ flags (e.g., IRQF_SHARED)
>> + *
>> + * This API sets up a threaded interrupt handler for a device that has
>> + * a dedicated wake-up interrupt in addition to the device IO interrupt,
>> + * allowing the caller to specify custom IRQ flags such as IRQF_SHARED.
>> + *
>> + * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
>> + */
>> +int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq_flags(struct device *dev, int irq, unsigned long flags)
>> +{
>> + struct wake_irq *wirq;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + flags |= IRQF_ONESHOT;
>> + if (!(flags & IRQF_SHARED))
>> + flags |= IRQF_NO_AUTOEN;
>> +
>> + ret = __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq, 0, flags);
>> + if (!ret && (flags & IRQF_SHARED)) {
>> + wirq = dev->power.wakeirq;
>> + disable_irq_nosync(wirq->irq);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq_flags);
> Instead of this, I'd introduce
>
> int dev_pm_set_dedicated_shared_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq,
> unsigned long additional_flags)
>
> that would pass IRQF_SHARED combined with additional_flags to
> __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq() to avoid having two different helper
> functions that can be used for the same purpose.
>
> I think that it would be sufficient for your use case.
Ack.
- Krishna Chaitanya.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists