[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bD_a=C0h-y4HDWPYV1VOWjM7V4gcocwekA6M9h5WbiqSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 13:25:05 -0500
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: pratyush@...nel.org, jasonmiu@...gle.com, graf@...zon.com,
dmatlack@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, corbet@....net,
rdunlap@...radead.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, kanie@...ux.alibaba.com,
ojeda@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com, masahiroy@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, yoann.congal@...le.fr,
mmaurer@...gle.com, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, chenridong@...wei.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, mark.rutland@....com, jannh@...gle.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, hannes@...xchg.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
david@...hat.com, joel.granados@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
anna.schumaker@...cle.com, song@...nel.org, linux@...ssschuh.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
rafael@...nel.org, dakr@...nel.org, bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org,
cw00.choi@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, yesanishhere@...il.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com,
aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, leon@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, wagi@...nel.org, djeffery@...hat.com,
stuart.w.hayes@...il.com, ptyadav@...zon.de, lennart@...ttering.net,
brauner@...nel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
saeedm@...dia.com, ajayachandra@...dia.com, jgg@...dia.com, parav@...dia.com,
leonro@...dia.com, witu@...dia.com, hughd@...gle.com, skhawaja@...gle.com,
chrisl@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/20] mm: shmem: use SHMEM_F_* flags instead of VM_* flags
On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 4:48 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 06:33:57PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> > From: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@...zon.de>
> >
> > shmem_inode_info::flags can have the VM flags VM_NORESERVE and
> > VM_LOCKED. These are used to suppress pre-accounting or to lock the
> > pages in the inode respectively. Using the VM flags directly makes it
> > difficult to add shmem-specific flags that are unrelated to VM behavior
> > since one would need to find a VM flag not used by shmem and re-purpose
> > it.
> >
> > Introduce SHMEM_F_NORESERVE and SHMEM_F_LOCKED which represent the same
> > information, but their bits are independent of the VM flags. Callers can
> > still pass VM_NORESERVE to shmem_get_inode(), but it gets transformed to
> > the shmem-specific flag internally.
> >
> > No functional changes intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@...zon.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
Thank you.
Pasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists