[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aRt5DPnMwzDw8_dF@kbusch-mbp>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 12:35:40 -0700
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] nvme-pci: Use size_t for length fields to handle
larger sizes
On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 09:22:43PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> index e5ca8301bb8b..b61ec62b0ec6 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -290,14 +290,14 @@ struct nvme_iod {
> u8 flags;
> u8 nr_descriptors;
>
> - unsigned int total_len;
> + size_t total_len;
Changing the generic phys_vec sounds fine, but the nvme driver has a 8MB
limitation on how large an IO can be, so I don't think the driver's
length needs to match the phys_vec type.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists