[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<176336702899.2854411.10334925946163449436.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:10:28 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@...nel.org
To: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, pjw@...nel.org, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, alex@...ti.fr, atishp@...osinc.com,
ajones@...tanamicro.com, cleger@...osinc.com, afd@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: sbi: Prefer SRST shutdown over legacy
Hello:
This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes)
by Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 06:58:06 +0000 you wrote:
> Currently, the sbi_init() always attempts to register the legacy shutdown
> function as the sys-off handler which is fine when RISCV_SBI_V01 is not
> enabled. However, if RISCV_SBI_V01 is enabled in the kernel and the SBI
> v0.1 is not supported by the underlying SBI implementation then the
> legacy shutdown fails. Fix this by not registering the legacy shutdown
> when SRST shutdown is available.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- riscv: sbi: Prefer SRST shutdown over legacy
https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/7b090e7b910c
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists