lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dbedc671-167e-4eb9-8d2c-bf04258621d6@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 18:20:27 +0800
From: "enlin.mu" <enlin.mu@...ux.dev>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-unisoc@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, enlin.mu@...soc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] clocksource/drivers/rda: Add sched_clock_register for
 RDA8810PL SoC



On 2025/11/17 17:36, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 02:33:47PM +0800, Enlin Mu wrote:
>> From: Enlin Mu <enlin.mu@...soc.com>
>>
>> The current system log timestamp accuracy is tick, which can not
>> meet the usage requirements and needs to reach nanoseconds.
> 
> Which 'usage requirement' you are referring here?
Hi Mani

When using this chip,the timestamp accuracy of the kernel log is tick,
which makes it difficult to analyze some system exceptions.
Therefore, it is neccessary to adujst the accuracy of the sched_clock 
function.

> 
>> Therefore, the sched_clock_register funciton needs to be add.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Enlin Mu <enlin.mu@...soc.com>
> 
> But I'm happy to see a patch from Unisoc for RDA Micro SoC :)
> 
> - Mani
> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/clocksource/timer-rda.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-rda.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-rda.c
>> index fd1199c189bf..0be8e05970e2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-rda.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-rda.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>>   
>>   #include <linux/init.h>
>>   #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched_clock.h>
>>   
>>   #include "timer-of.h"
>>   
>> @@ -153,7 +154,7 @@ static struct timer_of rda_ostimer_of = {
>>   	},
>>   };
>>   
>> -static u64 rda_hwtimer_read(struct clocksource *cs)
>> +static u64 rda_hwtimer_clocksource_read(void)
>>   {
>>   	void __iomem *base = timer_of_base(&rda_ostimer_of);
>>   	u32 lo, hi;
>> @@ -167,6 +168,11 @@ static u64 rda_hwtimer_read(struct clocksource *cs)
>>   	return ((u64)hi << 32) | lo;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static u64 rda_hwtimer_read(struct clocksource *cs)
>> +{
>> +	return rda_hwtimer_clocksource_read();
>> +}
>> +
>>   static struct clocksource rda_hwtimer_clocksource = {
>>   	.name           = "rda-timer",
>>   	.rating         = 400,
>> @@ -185,6 +191,7 @@ static int __init rda_timer_init(struct device_node *np)
>>   		return ret;
>>   
>>   	clocksource_register_hz(&rda_hwtimer_clocksource, rate);
>> +	sched_clock_register(rda_hwtimer_clocksource_read, 64, rate);
>>   
>>   	clockevents_config_and_register(&rda_ostimer_of.clkevt, rate,
>>   					0x2, UINT_MAX);
>> -- 
>> 2.39.5
>>
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ