[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251117110736.293040-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 19:07:04 +0800
From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/3] bpf: Fix FIONREAD and copied_seq issues
syzkaller reported a bug [1] where a socket using sockmap, after being
unloaded, exposed incorrect copied_seq calculation. The selftest I
provided can be used to reproduce the issue reported by syzkaller.
TCP recvmsg seq # bug 2: copied E92C873, seq E68D125, rcvnxt E7CEB7C, fl 40
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5997 at net/ipv4/tcp.c:2724 tcp_recvmsg_locked+0xb2f/0x2910 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2724
Call Trace:
<TASK>
receive_fallback_to_copy net/ipv4/tcp.c:1968 [inline]
tcp_zerocopy_receive+0x131a/0x2120 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2200
do_tcp_getsockopt+0xe28/0x26c0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:4713
tcp_getsockopt+0xdf/0x100 net/ipv4/tcp.c:4812
do_sock_getsockopt+0x34d/0x440 net/socket.c:2421
__sys_getsockopt+0x12f/0x260 net/socket.c:2450
__do_sys_getsockopt net/socket.c:2457 [inline]
__se_sys_getsockopt net/socket.c:2454 [inline]
__x64_sys_getsockopt+0xbd/0x160 net/socket.c:2454
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcd/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
A sockmap socket maintains its own receive queue (ingress_msg) which may
contain data from either its own protocol stack or forwarded from other
sockets.
FD1:read()
-- FD1->copied_seq++
| [read data]
|
[enqueue data] v
[sockmap] -> ingress to self -> ingress_msg queue
FD1 native stack ------> ^
-- FD1->rcv_nxt++ -> redirect to other | [enqueue data]
| |
| ingress to FD1
v ^
... | [sockmap]
FD2 native stack
The issue occurs when reading from ingress_msg: we update tp->copied_seq
by default, but if the data comes from other sockets (not the socket's
own protocol stack), tcp->rcv_nxt remains unchanged. Later, when
converting back to a native socket, reads may fail as copied_seq could
be significantly larger than rcv_nxt.
Additionally, FIONREAD calculation based on copied_seq and rcv_nxt is
insufficient for sockmap sockets, requiring separate field tracking.
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=06dbd397158ec0ea4983
Jiayuan Chen (3):
bpf, sockmap: Fix incorrect copied_seq calculation
bpf, sockmap: Fix FIONREAD for sockmap
bpf, selftest: Add tests for FIONREAD and copied_seq
include/linux/skmsg.h | 71 ++++++-
net/core/skmsg.c | 20 +-
net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 26 ++-
net/ipv4/udp_bpf.c | 25 ++-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c | 192 +++++++++++++++++-
.../bpf/progs/test_sockmap_pass_prog.c | 8 +
6 files changed, 325 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists