linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] genirq: Fix IRQ threads VS cpuset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87seeb5q5b.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 16:14:40 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Frederic Weisbecker
 <frederic@...nel.org>, Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>,
 Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] genirq: Fix IRQ threads VS cpuset

On Tue, Nov 18 2025 at 15:30, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> See here for previous patch:
>
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251105131726.46364-1-frederic@kernel.org/

It would be really useful if you would have 'PATCH V2' in the subject
lines of the series so it's easy distinguishable for humans and tools.

Thanks,

        tglx