[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd8x0MydzuEYFM7aaiaO3igF2NjJ_aVTfWVKUoQ-q21Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 17:30:09 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] iio: add processed write API
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 5:16 PM Romain Gantois
<romain.gantois@...tlin.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 6 November 2025 17:07:18 CET Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 03:11:47PM +0100, Romain Gantois wrote:
...
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_write_channel_processed_scale);
> >
> > Can we start using namespaced exports?
>
> Sounds good, but won't it look strange to have only
> iio_write_channel_processed_scale() use a namespaced export?
Nope, somebody needs to start this mission, everybody so far has this
excuse :-) I think now it's time.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists