linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net/ipv6: allow device-only routes via the multipath API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19a97e6e2a8.e1c4ccce20888.2202702737503651650@azey.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 17:58:02 +0100
From: azey <me@...y.net>
To: "nicolasdichtel" <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Cc: "David Ahern" <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Simon Horman" <horms@...nel.org>,
	"netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv6: allow device-only routes via the multipath
 API

On 2025-11-18 17:41:14 +0100,  Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> wrote:
> Having an address in the same prefix on two interfaces is not an "obscure setups".

Sorry, just a clarification on this since I didn't get the email in time before sending
my reply to David: I meant specifically the case where someone relies on the last route
always being selected in this scenario, setups that don't rely on that shouldn't be affected.