[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9pYvUZ8b9dzWi-XBk9N6A04MzSLELgnBezHUF7FHz-maA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 18:10:41 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jordan Rife <jordan@...fe.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 03/11] wireguard: netlink: enable strict
genetlink validation
Hi Asbjørn,
On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 7:32 PM Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net> wrote:
> static struct genl_family genl_family __ro_after_init = {
> .ops = genl_ops,
> .n_ops = ARRAY_SIZE(genl_ops),
> - .resv_start_op = WG_CMD_SET_DEVICE + 1,
> .name = WG_GENL_NAME,
> .version = WG_GENL_VERSION,
> .maxattr = WGDEVICE_A_MAX,
This patch is fine and standalone enough, that I merged it into my
wireguard.git devel branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zx2c4/wireguard-linux.git/commit/?h=devel&id=fbd8c752a8e3d00341fa7754d6e45e60d6b45490
If you wind up rerolling the rest of these, you can do it against that branch.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists