[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aRy0SVVuZaTfY3xU@google.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 10:00:41 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>,
Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@...el.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] perf stat fixes and improvements
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 10:05:06AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> A collection of fixes aiming to stabilize and make more reasonable
> measurements/metrics such as memory bandwidth.
>
> Tool events are changed from getting a PMU cpu map of all online CPUs
> to either CPU 0 or all online CPUs. This avoids iterating over useless
> CPUs for events in particular `duration_time`. Fix a bug where
> duration_time didn't correctly use the previous raw counts and would
> skip values in interval mode.
>
> Change how json metrics handle tool events. Use the counter value
> rather than using shared state with perf stat. A later patch changes
> it so that tool events are read last, so that if reading say memory
> bandwidth counters you don't divide by an earlier read time and exceed
> the theoretical maximum memory bandwidth.
[...]
Applied the first 7 patches to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Best regards,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists