linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add compatible for Facebook Anacapa BMC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJTz7Jd_fuTXpsseEE_161a7nLgoh4g9nH7M__HTsGihqNLQWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 03:11:41 -0500
From: Peter Shen <sjg168@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	peter.shen@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: aspeed: Add compatible for
 Facebook Anacapa BMC

Hi Krzysztof,

Thanks for your detailed explanation. I apologize for ignoring it earlier.
I now understand the importance of Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags, and of
not attaching patchsets to unrelated threads.

I will follow the proper process from now on, and also fix my local b4
environment so that generating the correct trailers works smoothly.

Best regards,
Peter

Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> 於 2025年11月18日 週二 上午2:21寫道：
>
> On 18/11/2025 05:10, Peter Shen wrote:
> > This patch adds the compatible string for the Facebook Anacapa BMC
> > which uses an Aspeed AST2600 SoC. This is required before adding
> > the board's device tree source file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Shen <sjg168@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/aspeed/aspeed.yaml | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
>
> So you just ignored everything I wrote? Long explanation and you just
> don't care?
>
> If so, then:
>
> NAK,
>
> Also, do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads
> (unrelated or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and
> might interfere with applying entire sets. See also:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16-rc2/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L830
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof