lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202511181607.3hTCfucu-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 16:57:52 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: 429368636@...com, lee@...nel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, pavel@...nel.org,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, zhangxinyu <gavin.zhang@...ot.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: add aw91xxx driver

Hi,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on lee-leds/for-leds-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.18-rc6 next-20251118]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/429368636-qq-com/leds-add-aw91xxx-driver/20251117-175335
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/leds.git for-leds-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_1B2BC712D34FBE7DEB01320E665BEB2D8908%40qq.com
patch subject: [PATCH] leds: add aw91xxx driver
config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251118/202511181607.3hTCfucu-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251118/202511181607.3hTCfucu-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511181607.3hTCfucu-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/leds/leds-aw91xxx.c: In function 'blink_store':
>> drivers/leds/leds-aw91xxx.c:653:30: warning: format '%x' expects a matching 'unsigned int *' argument [-Wformat=]
     653 |         if (sscanf(buf, "%x %x", &databuf[0]) == 1)
         |                             ~^
         |                              |
         |                              unsigned int *
   drivers/leds/leds-aw91xxx.c: At top level:
>> drivers/leds/leds-aw91xxx.c:1309:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'aw91xxx_irq_func' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    1309 | irqreturn_t aw91xxx_irq_func(int irq, void *key_data)
         |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/leds/leds-aw91xxx.c:1395:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'aw91xxx_int_work' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    1395 | void aw91xxx_int_work(struct work_struct *work)
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/leds/leds-aw91xxx.c: In function 'aw91xxx_key_work':
>> drivers/leds/leds-aw91xxx.c:1425:13: warning: variable 'key_num' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
    1425 |         int key_num = 0;
         |             ^~~~~~~


vim +653 drivers/leds/leds-aw91xxx.c

   645	
   646	static ssize_t
   647	blink_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t len)
   648	{
   649		unsigned int databuf[2];
   650		struct led_classdev *led_cdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
   651		struct aw91xxx *aw91xxx = container_of(led_cdev, struct aw91xxx, cdev);
   652	
 > 653		if (sscanf(buf, "%x %x", &databuf[0]) == 1)
   654			aw91xxx_led_blink(aw91xxx, databuf[0], 3);
   655	
   656		return len;
   657	}
   658	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ