[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875xb77m0m.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 10:00:57 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@...gle.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo.unipi@...il.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Willem de
Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] genirq: soft_moderation: implement adaptive
moderation
On Mon, Nov 17 2025 at 22:34, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> (First world problem, for sure: I have examples for AMD, Intel, Arm,
> all of them with 100+ CPUs per numa node, and 160-480 CPUs total)
> On some of the above platforms, MSIx interrupts cause heavy serialization
> of all other PCIe requests. As a result, when the total interrupt rate exceeds
> 1-2M intrs/s, I/O throughput degrades by up to 4x and more.
Is it actually the sum of all interrupts in the system or is it
segmented per root port?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists