[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251119-vsock-interrupted-connect-v2-1-70734cf1233f@rbox.co>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:02:59 +0100
From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, George Zhang <georgezhang@...are.com>,
Andy King <acking@...are.com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] vsock: Ignore signal/timeout on connect() if
already established
During connect(), acting on a signal/timeout by disconnecting an already
established socket leads to several issues:
1. connect() invoking vsock_transport_cancel_pkt() ->
virtio_transport_purge_skbs() may race with sendmsg() invoking
virtio_transport_get_credit(). This results in a permanently elevated
`vvs->bytes_unsent`. Which, in turn, confuses the SOCK_LINGER handling.
2. connect() resetting a connected socket's state may race with socket
being placed in a sockmap. A disconnected socket remaining in a sockmap
breaks sockmap's assumptions. And gives rise to WARNs.
3. connect() transitioning SS_CONNECTED -> SS_UNCONNECTED allows for a
transport change/drop after TCP_ESTABLISHED. Which poses a problem for
any simultaneous sendmsg() or connect() and may result in a
use-after-free/null-ptr-deref.
Do not disconnect socket on signal/timeout. Keep the logic for unconnected
sockets: they don't linger, can't be placed in a sockmap, are rejected by
sendmsg().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e07fd95c-9a38-4eea-9638-133e38c2ec9b@rbox.co/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250317-vsock-trans-signal-race-v4-0-fc8837f3f1d4@rbox.co/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/60f1b7db-3099-4f6a-875e-af9f6ef194f6@rbox.co/
Fixes: d021c344051a ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets")
Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
---
Changes in v2:
- Keep changes to minimum, fold in vsock_reset_interrupted() [Stefano]
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117-vsock-interrupted-connect-v1-1-bc021e907c3f@rbox.co
---
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 76763247a377..a9ca9c3b87b3 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1661,18 +1661,40 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
lock_sock(sk);
- if (signal_pending(current)) {
- err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
- sk->sk_state = sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ? TCP_CLOSING : TCP_CLOSE;
- sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
- vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
- vsock_remove_connected(vsk);
- goto out_wait;
- } else if ((sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) && (timeout == 0)) {
- err = -ETIMEDOUT;
+ /* Connection established. Whatever happens to socket once we
+ * release it, that's not connect()'s concern. No need to go
+ * into signal and timeout handling. Call it a day.
+ *
+ * Note that allowing to "reset" an already established socket
+ * here is racy and insecure.
+ */
+ if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED)
+ break;
+
+ /* If connection was _not_ established and a signal/timeout came
+ * to be, we want the socket's state reset. User space may want
+ * to retry.
+ *
+ * sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED implies that socket is not on
+ * vsock_connected_table. We keep the binding and the transport
+ * assigned.
+ */
+ if (signal_pending(current) || timeout == 0) {
+ err = timeout == 0 ? -ETIMEDOUT : sock_intr_errno(timeout);
+
+ /* Listener might have already responded with
+ * VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RESPONSE. Its handling expects our
+ * sk_state == TCP_SYN_SENT, which hereby we break.
+ * In such case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST will follow.
+ */
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
+
+ /* Try to cancel VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_REQUEST skb sent out by
+ * transport->connect().
+ */
vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
+
goto out_wait;
}
---
base-commit: 106a67494c53c56f55a2bd0757be0edb6eaa5407
change-id: 20250815-vsock-interrupted-connect-f92dfa5042cd
Best regards,
--
Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists