lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0858117f-9397-4045-9b7d-490ad24926cb@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 14:33:09 +0000
From: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet@...tlin.com>
To: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
 Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
 Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
 Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>,
 Phong LE <ple@...libre.com>, Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>,
 Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
 Adrien Grassein <adrien.grassein@...il.com>,
 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
 Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
 Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
 Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
 Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
 Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Anitha Chrisanthus <anitha.chrisanthus@...el.com>,
 Edmund Dea <edmund.j.dea@...el.com>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
 Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
 Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc: Hui Pu <Hui.Pu@...ealthcare.com>,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/26] drm/bridge: add devm_drm_of_find_bridge



On 11/19/25 13:05, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Several drivers (about 20) follow the same pattern:
> 
>   1. get a pointer to a bridge (typically the next bridge in the chain) by
>      calling of_drm_find_bridge()
>   2. store the returned pointer in the private driver data, keep it until
>      driver .remove
>   3. dereference the pointer at attach time and possibly at other times
> 
> of_drm_find_bridge() is now deprecated because it does not increment the
> refcount and should be replaced with drm_of_find_bridge() +
> drm_bridge_put().
> 
> However some of those drivers have a complex code flow and adding a
> drm_bridge_put() call in all the appropriate locations is error-prone,
> leads to ugly and more complex code, and can lead to errors over time with
> code flow changes.
> 
> To handle all those drivers in a straightforward way, add a devm variant of
> drm_of_find_bridge() that adds a devm action to invoke drm_bridge_put()
> when the said driver is removed. This allows all those drivers to put the
> reference automatically and safely with a one line change:
> 
>    - priv->next_bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(remote_np);
>    + priv->next_bridge = devm_drm_of_find_bridge(dev, remote_np);
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/drm/drm_bridge.h     |  5 +++++
>   2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
> index 09ad825f9cb8..c7baafbe5695 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
> @@ -1446,6 +1446,36 @@ struct drm_bridge *drm_of_find_bridge(struct device_node *np)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_of_find_bridge);
>   
> +/**
> + * devm_drm_of_find_bridge - find the bridge corresponding to the device
> + *			     node in the global bridge list and add a devm
> + *			     action to put it
> + *
> + * @dev: device requesting the bridge
> + * @np: device node
> + *
> + * On success the returned bridge refcount is incremented, and a devm
> + * action is added to call drm_bridge_put() when @dev is removed. So the
> + * caller does not have to put the returned bridge explicitly.
> + *
> + * RETURNS:
> + * drm_bridge control struct on success, NULL on failure

I am not sure for the "NULL on failure", you return ERR_PTR(err), which 
is probably not NULL but an error code.

> + */
> +struct drm_bridge *devm_drm_of_find_bridge(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	struct drm_bridge *bridge = drm_of_find_bridge(np);
> +
> +	if (bridge) {
> +		int err = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drm_bridge_put_void, bridge);
> +
> +		if (err)
> +			return ERR_PTR(err);
> +	}
> +
> +	return bridge;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_drm_of_find_bridge);
> +
>   /**
>    * of_drm_find_bridge - find the bridge corresponding to the device node in
>    *			the global bridge list
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
> index e74e91004c48..98d5433f7d35 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
> @@ -1314,12 +1314,17 @@ int drm_bridge_attach(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>   struct drm_bridge *drm_of_find_bridge(struct device_node *np);
> +struct drm_bridge *devm_drm_of_find_bridge(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np);
>   struct drm_bridge *of_drm_find_bridge(struct device_node *np);
>   #else
>   static inline struct drm_bridge *drm_of_find_bridge(struct device_node *np)
>   {
>   	return NULL;
>   }
> +static inline struct drm_bridge *devm_drm_of_find_bridge(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
>   static inline struct drm_bridge *of_drm_find_bridge(struct device_node *np)
>   {
>   	return NULL;
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ