[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aR3bUMvPCqZr5utj@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:59:28 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] treewide: Introduce %ptS for struct timespec64
and convert users
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 02:11:12PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2025-11-13 15:32:14, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Here is the third part of the unification time printing in the kernel.
> > This time for struct timespec64. The first patch brings a support
> > into printf() implementation (test cases and documentation update
> > included) followed by the treewide conversion of the current users.
> >
> > Petr, we got like more than a half being Acked, I think if you are okay
> > with this, the patches that have been tagged can be applied.
> >
> > Note, not everything was compile-tested. Kunit test has been passed, though.
>
> JFYI, the patchset has been committed into printk/linux.git,
> branch for-6.19-vsprintf-timespec64.
>
> Note, that I have:
>
> + fixed the 19th patch as proposed, see
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/aR2XAYWTEgMZu_Mx@pathway.suse.cz/
>
> + reviewed all patches but I triple checked 7th patch which
> did not have any ack yet. And I added my Reviewed-by tag
> there. ;-)
>
> + I tried build with allyesconfig. It succeeded. I am not 100%
> sure that it built all modified sources but...
Thank you!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists