[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7053f336-59c9-47cc-ac97-eb2f0916ac4f@foss.st.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:13:47 +0100
From: Christian Bruel <christian.bruel@...s.st.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
"Manivannan
Sadhasivam" <mani@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@...ner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: stm32: Fix LTSSM EP race with start link.
On 11/18/25 22:28, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Lukas in case I got the pciehp part wrong]
>
>
> To back up here, I'm trying to understand the race.
>
> IIUC the relevant events are link training and register init. In the
> current stm32 EP driver, link training can start when the EP userspace
> writes to the 'start' configfs file. And the register init happens
> when stm32_pcie_ep_perst_irq_thread() calls
> dw_pcie_ep_init_registers().
>
> So I guess the problem is when the EP userspace enables the LTSSM
> before the host deasserts PERST#? And the link train may complete
> before stm32_pcie_ep_perst_irq_thread() runs?
The sequence also violated the spec (4.0, Section 6.6.1 "Conventional
Reset"), because it allowed the endpoint to enter the Detect state
before PERST# is deasserted
>
> And the fix here is to delay enabling the EP LTSSM until after
> stm32_pcie_perst_deassert() calls dw_pcie_ep_init_registers()?
>
>
> I think we would prefer if the host would enumerate the endpoint
> whenever the endpoint becomes ready, even if that is after the host's
> initial enumeration, but I guess that's only possible if the host is
> notified when the link comes up.
>
> The main mechanism for that is hotplug, i.e., pciehp handles presence
> detect and link layer state changed events, both of which are managed
> by the PCIe Slot register set. Those registers are optional and may
> not be implemented, e.g., if a Root Port is connected to a
> system-integrated device.
>
> But if they *are* implemented, I hope that pciehp makes it so no user
> intervention on the host side is required.
>
I suppose that hotplug cannot be implemented without some kind of
presence detection signal from the EP (PRSNT#, ...) ? For now we have no
implementation to support this (from gpio or other).
However, using a PC host, I observe that when I resume the host from
PCIe autosuspend, for example, with 'lspci', PERST# is deasserted, and
the stm32 PCIe EP device is correctly enumerated without a manual
rescan. So thanks to power management, a device can be enumerated
asynchronously but when requested, not when ready.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists