[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aR3lg0aNaoT-_7SM@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 17:42:59 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Hoan Tran <hoan@...amperecomputing.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Daniel Palmer <daniel@...ngy.jp>,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@....com>,
Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@....com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/15] gpio: dwapb: Use modern PM macros
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 10:43:13PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Use the modern PM macros for the suspend and resume functions to be
> automatically dropped by the compiler when CONFIG_PM or
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP are disabled, without having to use #ifdef guards.
>
> This has the advantage of always compiling these functions in,
> independently of any Kconfig option. Thanks to that, bugs and other
> regressions are subsequently easier to catch.
...
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> /* Store GPIO context across system-wide suspend/resume transitions */
> struct dwapb_context {
> u32 data;
> u32 int_deb;
> u32 wake_en;
> };
> -#endif
This ifdeffery is to protect the type definition? It may be removed for sure.
...
> struct dwapb_gpio_port_irqchip {
> unsigned int nr_irqs;
> struct gpio_generic_chip chip;
> struct dwapb_gpio_port_irqchip *pirq;
> struct dwapb_gpio *gpio;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> struct dwapb_context *ctx;
> -#endif
But why this? For the PM_SLEEP=n cases it will give an unrequested overhead.
> unsigned int idx;
> };
Otherwise LGTM.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists