[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251119171605.GFaR37VWsqvQX8sDED@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 18:16:05 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>, "Lai, Yi1" <yi1.lai@...el.com>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] EDAC/{skx_common,imh}: Add EDAC driver for Intel
Diamond Rapids servers
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 05:05:15PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Periodically its time to stop heaping more uglification onto the current driver
> and cut a new one.
So is adding the new functionality going to make the old one ugly enough to
warrant the clean slate? Is the integrated memory/IO hub the new thing that is
going to be done going forward?
It doesn't get clear to me from the history (parts of which I remember too,
btw. :))
Don't get me wrong - you're going to end up maintaining all this so I'm just
playing the devil's advocate here.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists