[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bCtJD-FGtmCOfz8arUGqO6hFkxWcjG-wHz_S1Abt7rXEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 22:03:03 -0500
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, pratyush@...nel.org, jasonmiu@...gle.com,
graf@...zon.com, dmatlack@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, corbet@....net,
rdunlap@...radead.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, kanie@...ux.alibaba.com,
ojeda@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com, masahiroy@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, yoann.congal@...le.fr,
mmaurer@...gle.com, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, chenridong@...wei.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, mark.rutland@....com, jannh@...gle.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, hannes@...xchg.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
david@...hat.com, joel.granados@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
anna.schumaker@...cle.com, song@...nel.org, linux@...ssschuh.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
rafael@...nel.org, dakr@...nel.org, bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org,
cw00.choi@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, yesanishhere@...il.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com,
aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, leon@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, wagi@...nel.org, djeffery@...hat.com,
stuart.w.hayes@...il.com, ptyadav@...zon.de, lennart@...ttering.net,
brauner@...nel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
saeedm@...dia.com, ajayachandra@...dia.com, parav@...dia.com,
leonro@...dia.com, witu@...dia.com, hughd@...gle.com, skhawaja@...gle.com,
chrisl@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/20] liveupdate: luo_core: integrate with KHO
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 6:25 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 05:07:15PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
>
> > In this case, we cannot even rely on having "safe" memory, i.e. this
> > scratch only boot to preserve dmesg/core etc, this is unfortunate. Is
> > there a way to avoid defaulting to identify mode when we are booting
> > into the "maintenance" mode?
>
> Maybe one could be created?
>
> It's tricky though because you also really want to block drivers from
> using the iommu if you don't know they are quieted and you can't do
> that without parsing the KHO data, which you can't do because it
> doesn't understand it..
>
> IDK, I think the "maintenance" mode is something that is probably best
> effort and shouldn't be relied on. It will work if the iommu data is
> restored or other lucky conditions hit, so it is not useless, but it
> is certainly not robust or guaranteed.
Right, even kdump has always been best-effort; many types of crashes
do not make it to the crash kernel.
> You are better to squirt a panic message out of the serial port and
For early boot LUO mismatches, or if FLB data is inaccessible for any
reason, devices might go rogue, so triggering a panic during boot is
appropriate.
However, session and file data structures are deserialized later, when
/dev/liveupdate is first opened by userspace. If deserialization fails
at that stage, I think we should simply fail the open(/dev/liveupdate)
call with an error such as -EIO.
Pasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists