[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202511191439.C737EF792@keescook>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 14:40:04 -0800
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] net: inet_sock.h: Avoid thousands of
-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end warnings
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 01:36:41PM +0900, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> struct ip_options_data {
> struct ip_options_rcu opt;
> - char data[40];
> };
If this just contains struct ip_options_rcu now, can ip_options_data
just be removed entirely?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists