[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f6f5434-3650-465a-9f67-eeab11954c30@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:56:38 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: tracing: Update fprobe selftest for ftrace
based fprobe
On 11/19/25 15:34, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:16:04 -0700
> Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> On 11/12/25 06:13, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
>>> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
>>>
>>> Since the ftrace fprobe is both fgraph and ftrace based implemented,
>>> the selftest needs to be updated. This does not count the actual
>>> number of lines, but just check the differences.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
>>> ---
>>> .../ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_fprobe.tc | 18 ++++--------------
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Steve, do you want me to take this through my tree?
>
> Yes please, unless Masami thinks otherwise.
>
Applied to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.19-rc1.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists