linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/21] lib/vsprintf: Add specifier for printing struct timespec64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aR2KfgzV1_3ZzXhT@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 11:14:38 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
	ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/21] lib/vsprintf: Add specifier for printing struct
 timespec64

On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 08:46:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 01:59:38PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Thu 2025-11-13 15:32:15, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > I wonder how to move forward. I could take the whole patchset via
> > printk tree. There is no conflict with linux-next at the moment.
> > 
> > It seems that only 3 patches haven't got any ack yet. I am going
> > to wait for more feedback and push it later the following week
> > (Wednesday or so) unless anyone complains.
> 
> Sounds good to me!
> 
> But in the worst case all but untagged can be pushed, the rest can go
> to the next cycle.

Just got a "BUILD SUCCESS" from LKP and since we gained even more tags
I think it's ready to go.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko