[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <81BC8F8F-91A2-4414-9847-292D974042B6@public-files.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 10:26:40 +0100
From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
robh@...nel.org
CC: matthias.bgg@...il.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mediatek: Apply all DT overlays at build time
Am 19. November 2025 09:39:07 MEZ schrieb AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>:
>Il 18/11/25 18:02, Frank Wunderlich ha scritto:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this looks similar to my attempt i did here
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20240608080530.9436-2-linux@fw-web.de/
>>
>> But in my case i added full dtb with 2 overlays as there can be 2 devices (1 mmc + 1 spi) at one time.
>> So usable as dtb for bootloader config without overlays, not only for validation...
>>
>
>Please don't top post :-)
Sorry for that :(
>That said, for the target of what is done here, I think yours is nicer to the eye
>compared to Rob's (not his fault at all, most of the times overlays cannot be
>applied together, he can't possibly know if that is possible in this case).
>
>If there is really no other solution to that... well, at this point I prefer to
>have something nicer to the eye, with all of the necessary "evil" that comes with
>it.
If my version is ok for rob (afair he did not replied on that yet),i would resend it again with similar for R4 and R4Pro.
>P.S.: Strong words contained in this reply are meant to be lighter than they appear
>Cheers,
>Angelo
regards Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists