[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5dbbce76-b8c6-4654-8098-fce1ee7b7b47@damsy.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 10:34:04 +0100
From: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric@...sy.net>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/20] drm/amdgpu: pass all the sdma scheds to
amdgpu_mman
Le 17/11/2025 à 10:46, Christian König a écrit :
> On 11/13/25 17:05, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
>> This will allow the use of all of them for clear/fill buffer
>> operations.
>> Since drm_sched_entity_init requires a scheduler array, we
>> store schedulers rather than rings. For the few places that need
>> access to a ring, we can get it from the sched using container_of.
>>
>> Since the code is the same for all sdma versions, add a new
>> helper amdgpu_sdma_set_buffer_funcs_scheds to set buffer_funcs_scheds
>> based on the number of sdma instances.
>>
>> Note: the new sched array is identical to the amdgpu_vm_manager one.
>> These 2 could be merged.
>
> I realized a bit after we discussed it that this isn't true.
>
> We need the two arrays separated for a Navi 1x workaround to work correctly.
Why 2 arrays? AFAICT the only needed thing is for amdgpu_ttm to be aware that it
should only use a single sched in this situation.
>
> Anyway, that doesn't affect reviewing this patch here.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 2 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_benchmark.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 8 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 41 +++++++++++++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 3 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/cik_sdma.c | 3 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v2_4.c | 3 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v3_0.c | 3 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c | 6 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_4_2.c | 6 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v5_0.c | 6 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v5_2.c | 6 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v6_0.c | 3 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v7_0.c | 3 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si_dma.c | 3 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c | 3 +-
>> 17 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> index 3fab3dc9f3e4..05c13fb0e6bf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>> @@ -1615,6 +1615,8 @@ ssize_t amdgpu_get_soft_full_reset_mask(struct amdgpu_ring *ring);
>> ssize_t amdgpu_show_reset_mask(char *buf, uint32_t supported_reset);
>> void amdgpu_sdma_set_vm_pte_scheds(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> const struct amdgpu_vm_pte_funcs *vm_pte_funcs);
>> +void amdgpu_sdma_set_buffer_funcs_scheds(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> + const struct amdgpu_buffer_funcs *buffer_funcs);
>>
>> /* atpx handler */
>> #if defined(CONFIG_VGA_SWITCHEROO)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_benchmark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_benchmark.c
>> index b59040a8771f..9ea927e07a77 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_benchmark.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_benchmark.c
>> @@ -32,12 +32,14 @@ static int amdgpu_benchmark_do_move(struct amdgpu_device *adev, unsigned size,
>> uint64_t saddr, uint64_t daddr, int n, s64 *time_ms)
>> {
>> ktime_t stime, etime;
>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
>> struct dma_fence *fence;
>> int i, r;
>>
>> + ring = container_of(adev->mman.buffer_funcs_scheds[0], struct amdgpu_ring, sched);
>
> We have the to_amdgpu_ring() macro for that.
I'll update the patch, thx.
>
>> +
>> stime = ktime_get();
>> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
>> - struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring;
>> r = amdgpu_copy_buffer(ring, &adev->mman.default_entity.base,
>> saddr, daddr, size, NULL, &fence,
>> false, 0);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> index b92234d63562..1927d940fbca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> @@ -3303,7 +3303,7 @@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> if (r)
>> goto init_failed;
>>
>> - if (adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring->sched.ready)
>> + if (adev->mman.buffer_funcs_scheds[0]->ready)
>> amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status(adev, true);
>>
>> /* Don't init kfd if whole hive need to be reset during init */
>> @@ -4143,7 +4143,7 @@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>
>> r = amdgpu_device_ip_resume_phase2(adev);
>>
>> - if (adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring->sched.ready)
>> + if (adev->mman.buffer_funcs_scheds[0]->ready)
>
> We should probably drop that check here and move this into amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status().
What should amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status() do if ready is false but enable
is true? Exit early?
>
>> amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status(adev, true);
>>
>> if (r)
>> @@ -4493,7 +4493,7 @@ int amdgpu_device_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> adev->num_rings = 0;
>> RCU_INIT_POINTER(adev->gang_submit, dma_fence_get_stub());
>> adev->mman.buffer_funcs = NULL;
>> - adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring = NULL;
>> + adev->mman.num_buffer_funcs_scheds = 0;
>> adev->vm_manager.vm_pte_funcs = NULL;
>> adev->vm_manager.vm_pte_num_scheds = 0;
>> adev->gmc.gmc_funcs = NULL;
>> @@ -5965,7 +5965,7 @@ int amdgpu_device_reinit_after_reset(struct amdgpu_reset_context *reset_context)
>> if (r)
>> goto out;
>>
>> - if (tmp_adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring->sched.ready)
>> + if (tmp_adev->mman.buffer_funcs_scheds[0]->ready)
>> amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status(tmp_adev, true);
>>
>> r = amdgpu_device_ip_resume_phase3(tmp_adev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c
>> index 2713dd51ab9a..4433d8620129 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c
>> @@ -651,12 +651,14 @@ int amdgpu_gmc_allocate_vm_inv_eng(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> void amdgpu_gmc_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
>> uint32_t vmhub, uint32_t flush_type)
>> {
>> - struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring;
>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
>> struct amdgpu_vmhub *hub = &adev->vmhub[vmhub];
>> struct dma_fence *fence;
>> struct amdgpu_job *job;
>> int r, i;
>>
>> + ring = container_of(adev->mman.buffer_funcs_scheds[0], struct amdgpu_ring, sched);
>> +
>> if (!hub->sdma_invalidation_workaround || vmid ||
>> !adev->mman.buffer_funcs_enabled || !adev->ib_pool_ready ||
>> !ring->sched.ready) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>> index 6c333dba7a35..11fec0fa4c11 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static int amdgpu_ttm_copy_mem_to_mem(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> struct dma_resv *resv,
>> struct dma_fence **f)
>> {
>> - struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring;
>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
>> struct amdgpu_res_cursor src_mm, dst_mm;
>> struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
>> int r = 0;
>> @@ -321,6 +321,8 @@ static int amdgpu_ttm_copy_mem_to_mem(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> + ring = container_of(adev->mman.buffer_funcs_scheds[0], struct amdgpu_ring, sched);
>> +
>> amdgpu_res_first(src->mem, src->offset, size, &src_mm);
>> amdgpu_res_first(dst->mem, dst->offset, size, &dst_mm);
>>
>> @@ -1493,6 +1495,7 @@ static int amdgpu_ttm_access_memory_sdma(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> struct amdgpu_bo *abo = ttm_to_amdgpu_bo(bo);
>> struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(abo->tbo.bdev);
>> struct amdgpu_res_cursor src_mm;
>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
>> struct amdgpu_job *job;
>> struct dma_fence *fence;
>> uint64_t src_addr, dst_addr;
>> @@ -1530,7 +1533,8 @@ static int amdgpu_ttm_access_memory_sdma(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>> amdgpu_emit_copy_buffer(adev, &job->ibs[0], src_addr, dst_addr,
>> PAGE_SIZE, 0);
>>
>> - amdgpu_ring_pad_ib(adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring, &job->ibs[0]);
>> + ring = container_of(adev->mman.buffer_funcs_scheds[0], struct amdgpu_ring, sched);
>> + amdgpu_ring_pad_ib(ring, &job->ibs[0]);
>> WARN_ON(job->ibs[0].length_dw > num_dw);
>>
>> fence = amdgpu_job_submit(job);
>> @@ -2196,11 +2200,9 @@ u32 amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable)
>> return windows;
>>
>> if (enable) {
>> - struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
>> struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched;
>>
>> - ring = adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring;
>> - sched = &ring->sched;
>> + sched = adev->mman.buffer_funcs_scheds[0];
>> r = drm_sched_entity_init(&adev->mman.default_entity.base,
>> DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL, &sched,
>> 1, NULL);
>> @@ -2432,7 +2434,7 @@ int amdgpu_ttm_clear_buffer(struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
>> struct dma_fence **fence)
>> {
>> struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev);
>> - struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring;
>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
>> struct amdgpu_ttm_buffer_entity *entity;
>> struct amdgpu_res_cursor cursor;
>> u64 addr;
>> @@ -2443,6 +2445,8 @@ int amdgpu_ttm_clear_buffer(struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
>>
>> if (!fence)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + ring = container_of(adev->mman.buffer_funcs_scheds[0], struct amdgpu_ring, sched);
>> entity = &adev->mman.clear_entities[0];
>> *fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
>>
>> @@ -2494,9 +2498,9 @@ int amdgpu_fill_buffer(struct amdgpu_ttm_buffer_entity *entity,
>> u64 k_job_id)
>> {
>> struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev);
>> - struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring;
>> struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
>> struct amdgpu_res_cursor dst;
>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring;
>> int r, e;
>>
>> if (!adev->mman.buffer_funcs_enabled) {
>> @@ -2505,6 +2509,8 @@ int amdgpu_fill_buffer(struct amdgpu_ttm_buffer_entity *entity,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> + ring = container_of(adev->mman.buffer_funcs_scheds[0], struct amdgpu_ring, sched);
>> +
>> if (entity == NULL) {
>> e = atomic_inc_return(&adev->mman.next_clear_entity) %
>> adev->mman.num_clear_entities;
>> @@ -2579,6 +2585,27 @@ int amdgpu_ttm_evict_resources(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int mem_type)
>> return ttm_resource_manager_evict_all(&adev->mman.bdev, man);
>> }
>>
>> +void amdgpu_sdma_set_buffer_funcs_scheds(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> + const struct amdgpu_buffer_funcs *buffer_funcs)
>> +{
>> + struct amdgpu_vmhub *hub = &adev->vmhub[AMDGPU_GFXHUB(0)];
>> + struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + adev->mman.buffer_funcs = buffer_funcs;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < adev->sdma.num_instances; i++) {
>> + if (adev->sdma.has_page_queue)
>> + sched = &adev->sdma.instance[i].page.sched;
>> + else
>> + sched = &adev->sdma.instance[i].ring.sched;
>> + adev->mman.buffer_funcs_scheds[i] = sched;
>> + }
>> +
>> + adev->mman.num_buffer_funcs_scheds = hub->sdma_invalidation_workaround ?
>> + 1 : adev->sdma.num_instances;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Probably better to make all SDMA version switch to use amdgpu_sdma_set_buffer_funcs_scheds() one patch and then changing amdgpu_sdma_set_buffer_funcs_scheds() to use more than one DMA engine a second patch.
I'm not sure it's useful: this patch simply creates an array of scheduler, but
every user of this array only use the first sched.
Enabling multiple schedulers usage is done in the "drm/amdgpu: give ttm entities
access to all the sdma scheds" patch.
Pierre-Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists