linux-kernel - [PATCH] lib: ratelimit: Fix spelling mistake 'seperately'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251119101144.3175-1-a0979625527@icloud.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 18:11:44 +0800
From: Chia-Liang Wang <wjliang627@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chia-Liang Wang <a0979652527@...oud.com>
Subject: [PATCH] lib: ratelimit: Fix spelling mistake 'seperately'

From: Chia-Liang Wang <a0979652527@...oud.com>

Corrects a spelling mistake in a comment in ratelimit.c where
'seperately' was used instead of 'separately'.

Signed-off-by: Chia-Liang Wang <a0979652527@...oud.com>
---
 lib/ratelimit.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/ratelimit.c b/lib/ratelimit.c
index 859c251b23ce..e2d65d3b1c35 100644
--- a/lib/ratelimit.c
+++ b/lib/ratelimit.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 int ___ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs, const char *func)
 {
 	/* Paired with WRITE_ONCE() in .proc_handler().
-	 * Changing two values seperately could be inconsistent
+	 * Changing two values separately could be inconsistent
 	 * and some message could be lost.  (See: net_ratelimit_state).
 	 */
 	int interval = READ_ONCE(rs->interval);
-- 
2.43.0