lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aR8cM0d6jrXG7hwP@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 15:48:35 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@...ngson.cn>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chong Qiao <qiaochong@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: ls2kbmc: Fully convert to use managed
 resources

On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 01:39:27PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2025, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 08:54:02AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2025, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 04:47:03PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2025, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > > > > > Fixes: 91a3e1f5453a ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Check for devm_mfd_add_devices() failure")
> > > > > > Fixes: d952bba3fbb5 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Add Loongson-2K BMC reset function support")
> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@...ngson.cn>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  drivers/mfd/ls2k-bmc-core.c | 28 +++++++---------------------
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Still doesn't apply.  I'm getting lots of conflicts.
> > > > > 
> > > > > What base are you on?
> > > > 
> > > > Linux Next which includes your -fixes branch. You probably need to merge either
> > > > it or v6.18-rc6 to the -next. Then the v1 will be okay to apply.
> > > 
> > > Ah, yes, that explains it.
> > > 
> > > > The bottom line is that without doing that we will have conflicts either in
> > > > Linux Next followed by merging by Linus or in your branches locally before
> > > > going to the above mentioned.
> > > > 
> > > > Another possibility is cherry-pick patches from -fixes to -next.
> > > > 
> > > > And alternative is to wait for -rc1 and rebase this on top of and
> > > > apply then.
> > 
> > > Yes, if there is no urgency,
> > 
> > It's up to you and the author of the code, it's a fix, but I don't think it's
> > too critical, we can wait, yes.
> > 
> > > we can wait for the next merge window.
> > 
> > It's a fix, do you mean to apply after -rc1 for v6.19-rcX?
> 
> Yes, we can merged it though for-mfd-fixes.

Okay, let's wait for v6.19-rc1 then.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ