linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 0/3] Samsung mfd/rtc driver alarm IRQ simplification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20251120-s5m-alarm-v2-0-cc15f0e32161@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 14:38:03 +0000
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, 
 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, 
 Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, 
 Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, Juan Yescas <jyescas@...gle.com>, 
 Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com, 
 Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, 
 André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] Samsung mfd/rtc driver alarm IRQ simplification

Hi,

With the attached patches the Samsung s5m RTC driver is simplified a
little bit with regards to alarm IRQ acquisition.

The end result is that instead of having a list of IRQ numbers for each
variant (and a BUILD_BUG_ON() to ensure consistency), the RTC driver
queries the 'alarm' platform resource from the parent (mfd cell).

Additionally, we can drop a now-useless field from runtime data,
reducing memory consumption slightly.

The attached patches must be applied in-order as patch 2 without 1 will
fail at runtime, and patch 3 without 2 will fail at build time. I would
expect them all to go via the MFD tree. Alternatively, they could be
applied individually to the respective kernel trees during multiple
kernel release cycles, but that seems a needless complication and
delay.

Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- rebase on top of https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251114-s2mpg10-chained-irq-v1-1-34ddfa49c4cd@linaro.org
- return struct regmap_irq_chip_data * in sec_irq_init() (Lee)
- collect tags
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251114-s5m-alarm-v1-0-c9b3bebae65f@linaro.org

---
André Draszik (3):
      mfd: sec: add rtc alarm IRQ as platform device resource
      rtc: s5m: query platform device IRQ resource for alarm IRQ
      mfd: sec: drop now unused struct sec_pmic_dev::irq_data

 drivers/mfd/sec-common.c         | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
 drivers/mfd/sec-core.h           |  2 +-
 drivers/mfd/sec-irq.c            | 63 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c            | 21 +++++---------
 include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h |  1 -
 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 9ad5de6d54f306b2bbf7ceb27e67a60c58a71224
change-id: 20251114-s5m-alarm-3de705ea53ce

Best regards,
-- 
André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>