[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMgjq7Bm4ZD3nHLT0pvA7T2pMr+pP7ZAd0Ho_8YKpj8gskQ_TA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 23:24:12 +0800
From: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
To: YoungJun Park <youngjun.park@....com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>, Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Ying Huang <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/19] mm, swap: consolidate cluster reclaim and check logic
On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 3:13 PM YoungJun Park <youngjun.park@....com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 04:11:37PM +0900, YoungJun Park wrote:
> > I found the just very Nit comment cleanup.
> >
> > In swap_cache_add_folio() comment, it mentions "SWAP_HAS_CACHE bit
> > to avoid race or conflict." Also shouldn't the comments that reference
> > HAS_CACHE(the word, swapfile.c) be updated accordingly?
> >
> > Youngjun Park
>
> I added reply on wrong patchset, Sorry.
>
> The comment is for
> [PATCH v2 18/19] mm, swap: drop the SWAP_HAS_CACHE flag
No problem, I got what you mean. Yeah, that one more comment to clean
up. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists