[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aR80HzlVD4OBsFnx@e133380.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 15:30:39 +0000
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
To: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86,fs/resctrl: Factor MBA parse-time conversion to
be per-arch
Hi Ben,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 11:06:32AM +0000, Ben Horgan wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 10/31/25 15:41, Dave Martin wrote:
> > The control value parser for the MB resource currently coerces the
> > memory bandwidth percentage value from userspace to be an exact
> > multiple of the rdt_resource::resctrl_membw::bw_gran parameter.
> >
> > On MPAM systems, this results in somewhat worse-than-worst-case
> > rounding, since the bandwidth granularity advertised to resctrl by the
> > MPAM driver is in general only an approximation to the actual hardware
> > granularity on these systems, and the hardware bandwidth allocation
> > control value is not natively a percentage -- necessitating a further
> > conversion in the resctrl_arch_update_domains() path, regardless of the
> > conversion done at parse time.
> >
> > Allow the arch to provide its own parse-time conversion that is
> > appropriate for the hardware, and move the existing conversion to x86.
> > This will avoid accumulated error from rounding the value twice on MPAM
> > systems.
> >
> > Clarify the documentation, but avoid overly exact promises.
> >
> > Clamping to bw_min and bw_max still feels generic: leave it in the core
> > code, for now.
> >
> > No functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
> >
> Seems sensible and helpful for MPAM.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
Thanks for taking a look.
Cheers
---Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists