[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jlxgiuqnkwdjujcpv2eaaq4b7yvkynkabnhwlt34cwctladpim@aoeikoylbnld>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 07:47:11 -0800
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Andre Carvalho <asantostc@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] netconsole: resume previously
deactivated target
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 07:49:22AM +0000, Andre Carvalho wrote:
> Attempt to resume a previously deactivated target when the associated
> interface comes back (NETDEV_UP event is received) by calling
> __netpoll_setup on the device.
>
> Depending on how the target was setup (by mac or interface name), the
> corresponding field is compared with the device being brought up.
>
> Targets that are candidates for resuming are removed from the target list
> and added to a temp list, as __netpoll_setup is IRQ unsafe.
> __netpoll_setup assumes RTNL is held (which is guaranteed to be the
> case when handling the event). In case of success, hold a reference to
> the device which will be removed upon target (or netconsole) removal by
> netpoll_cleanup.
>
> Target transitions to STATE_DISABLED in case of failures resuming it to
> avoid retrying the same target indefinitely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Carvalho <asantostc@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
This is now conflicting with Gustavo's patchset. I would suggest we get
Gustavo's patches merged first, and then you respin this one, please.
Thus, I am marking this as "change-requested" just to help the main
network maintainers, if that is the right process.
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists