[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b64fd3e-5a78-4955-b3ab-8ae104449414@phytec.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:05:28 +0200
From: Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@...tec.de>
To: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: Add missing applied DT overlay targets
On 11/20/25 7:14 AM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
>
>
> On 20/11/25 03:26, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 8:47 AM Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com> wrote:
>>>
>>> + wadim who posted something similar:
>>>
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> On 18/11/25 02:43, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>>>> It's a requirement that DT overlays be applied at build time in order to
>>>> validate them as overlays are not validated on their own.
>>>>
>>>> Add the missing TI overlays. Some of the TI overlays have the first part
>>>> needed (a "*-dtbs" variable), but not the second part adding the target to
>>>> dtb-y/dtb- variable.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
>>>
>>> Look like there is more needed change needed.
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251119123216.1481420-1-w.egorov@phytec.de/
>>>
>>> Could one of you post the superset patch?
>>
>> I'll leave it to Wadim.
>
> Probably best to merge Wadim's patch first and then then delta. I will
> take care of posting the next as TI board targets need a bit more tweaking.
OK, let me know if there is anything needed from my side.
>
>>
>>>
>>> I have already sent out the PR for v6.19rc1 for TI tree? Is [1] plan to
>>> be merged for v6.19 cycle, if so I will plan for a follow up PR with
>>> newer version of this patch.
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> This will soon be a warning[1].
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251114222759.4181152-1-robh@kernel.org/
>>>
>>> BTW, with above patch, make dtbs seems to fail w/o CONFIG_OF_ALL_DTBS=y.
>>> Is that expected?
>>
>> Yes. What's in linux-next now is fixed.
>>
>> Rob
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists