[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aR6/Kc0kag8Z9y6y@yjaykim-PowerEdge-T330>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:11:37 +0900
From: YoungJun Park <youngjun.park@....com>
To: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/19] mm, swap: consolidate cluster reclaim and check
logic
I found the just very Nit comment cleanup.
In swap_cache_add_folio() comment, it mentions "SWAP_HAS_CACHE bit
to avoid race or conflict." Also shouldn't the comments that reference
HAS_CACHE(the word, swapfile.c) be updated accordingly?
Youngjun Park
Powered by blists - more mailing lists