linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: Add trivial-devices for WSEN-tids temperature sensor and wsen as vendor-prefix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251120-towering-clam-of-memory-d96a6e@kuoka>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:02:02 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Marangoni <Thomas.Marangoni@...om-group.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, 
	conor+dt@...nel.org, linux@...ck-us.net, corbet@....net, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, 
	michal.simek@....com, nuno.sa@...log.com, Frank.Li@....com, wenswang@...h.net, 
	apokusinski01@...il.com, dixitparmar19@...il.com, vassilisamir@...il.com, 
	paweldembicki@...il.com, heiko@...ech.de, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, 
	kever.yang@...k-chips.com, prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com, mani@...nel.org, 
	dev@...l-k.io, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: Add trivial-devices for WSEN-tids
 temperature sensor and wsen as vendor-prefix

On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 01:51:38PM +0100, Thomas Marangoni wrote:
> WSEN-tids only has an i2c interface and an optional interrupt. This
> should qualify the sensor as trivial device.
> 
> WSEN is a subcompany of Würth Electronics specialized on IC sensors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Marangoni <Thomas.Marangoni@...om-group.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trivial-devices.yaml | 2 ++
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>

<form letter>
This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review
tags are being ignored. If you know the process, just skip it entirely
(please do not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions
intended, no patronizing, I just want to avoid wasted efforts). If you
do not know the process, here is a short explanation:

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here ('b4 trailers -u ...').
However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The
upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they
apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L591
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof