[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UCnt3nUktRyzUDp1agDFp3ZJo=t+xBbLCD6W7Jd0aF7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:53:03 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: incogcyberpunk@...ton.me
Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
"regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, "marcel@...tmann.org" <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"luiz.dentz@...il.com" <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
"linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
"johan.hedberg@...il.com" <johan.hedberg@...il.com>, "sean.wang@...iatek.com" <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Bluetooth adapter provided by `btusb` not recognized
since v6.13.2
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 4:43 PM <incogcyberpunk@...ton.me> wrote:
>
> Yes, manually updating `drivers/btusb/btusb.c` , with the below proposed patch fixes the regression issue.
> The proposed patch solves the regression of `bluetooth adapter provided by btusb not being recognized in both the stable and the mainline kernel since 6.13.2`
>
> The proposed patch:
> `
> index a722446ec73d..1466e0f1865d 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> @@ -2714,6 +2714,11 @@ static void btusb_mtk_claim_iso_intf(struct btusb_data *data)
> struct btmtk_data *btmtk_data = hci_get_priv(data->hdev);
> int err;
>
> + if (!btmtk_data->isopkt_intf) {
> + bt_dev_err(data->hdev, "Can't claim NULL iso interface");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * The function usb_driver_claim_interface() is documented to need
> * locks held if it's not called from a probe routine. The code here
> `
>
> I applied the patch as suggested, but now what do I have to do to get this fixed upstream and fixed in the next mainline & stable releases.
Excellent. The best way to get the fix landed is to respond to the
post I made at:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251119085354.1.I1ae7aebc967e52c7c4be7aa65fbd81736649568a@changeid
...and add your "Tested-by" tag. With that, the Bluetooth maintainers
(if they're happy with the patch) will land it and it can start
working its way to stable.
> Also, could you brief a bit, on how this proposed patch containing , a NULL check for the `btmtk_data->isopkt_intf`; solves the problems introduced by the problematic commit with: [ Upstream commit e9087e828827e5a5c85e124ce77503f2b81c3491 ]
Check out the commit message on the patch I posted. I explained why
the NULL check fixes the problem there. If that's unclear, I can try
rewording.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists