[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77bcb402-dc38-4f04-95e4-ff4fd5812ac1@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:50:20 +0800
From: "Aiqun(Maria) Yu" <aiqun.yu@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com, trilok.soni@....qualcomm.com,
yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: cpus: Add Qualcomm Oryon compatibles
On 11/20/2025 4:24 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 09:50:53PM -0800, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>> Previous "qcom,oryon" is too generic, add specific cpu bindings:
>
> Why is too generic? Why gen1/2/3 is not generic? Both sound exactly the
> same for me - arbitrary number incremented from 1 does not make it less
> generic.
This is align the qualcomm announced cpu information, there is no other
more information revealed publicly. The reference is from [1].
For me, it is likely the generation numbers information is having more
information compare to "qcom,oryon". And the current patch is to be
address the comments like [2]. What's your specific suggestion on this pls?
[1]
https://www.qualcomm.com/smartphones/products/8-series/snapdragon-8-elite-gen-5
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/2960a6fc-106b-4280-b4d4-9c1a3a449454@oss.qualcomm.com/
>
>> qcom,oryon-gen1 for X1E80100, qcom,oryon-gen2 for SM8750, qcom,oryon-gen3
>> for Kaanapali.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
--
Thx and BRs,
Aiqun(Maria) Yu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists