[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H5+0Yeut3nST4BpfmFcP=mNKQ3r=7k8vPW33cpJHeLKjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:54:28 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 13/14] LoongArch: Adjust default config files for 32BIT/64BIT
On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 4:27 PM Thomas Weißschuh
<thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 04:16:25PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > Hi, Thomas,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 4:11 PM Thomas Weißschuh
> > <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 07:27:27PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > > > Add loongson32_defconfig (for 32BIT) and rename loongson3_defconfig to
> > > > loongson64_defconfig (for 64BIT).
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/loongarch/configs/loongson32_defconfig | 1110 +++++++++++++++++
> > > > ...ongson3_defconfig => loongson64_defconfig} | 0
> > > > 2 files changed, 1110 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/configs/loongson32_defconfig
> > > > rename arch/loongarch/configs/{loongson3_defconfig => loongson64_defconfig} (100%)
> > >
> > > KBUILD_DEFCONFIG also needs to be adapted to this rename.
> > That is done in the last patch.
>
> That means the 64bit 'make defconfig' is broken within this series, potentially
> breaking bisects.
You are right, that should be done in this patch.
>
> > > FYI the cover letter says the series is based on v6.16-rc6, but the series
> > > doesn't apply to it.
> > Not 6.16-rc6, but 6.18-rc6, and the next version will be on top of 6.18-rc7.
>
> That was a mistype. It doesn't apply to v6.18-rc6.
>
> Looking at the GitHub repo mentioned in the cover letter, there are additional
> patches on top of rc6. Which I guess is fine in general, but the changelog
> could be a bit clearer.
OK, I know, thank you.
Huacai
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists