linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] mfd: mt6358: Using a single IRQ array instead of two companion arrays?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251120100545.GX1949330@google.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 10:05:45 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Angelo Gioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
	Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mfd: mt6358: Using a single IRQ array instead of two
 companion arrays?

On Wed, 19 Nov 2025, Markus Elfring wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I have taken another look also at the implementation of the function “mt6358_irq_init”.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18-rc6/source/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c#L227-L293
> 
> I see that there are two arrays allocated so far.
> How do you think about the possibility to use a single array with the needed data instead?

It'll be easier if you just submit the patch.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]