lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19D052E6-7E81-455B-AB31-C805AD65F96A@public-files.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:02:26 +0100
From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>, srini@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
 krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
 daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, lukasz.luba@....com,
 matthias.bgg@...il.com
CC: nfraprado@...labora.com, arnd@...db.de, colin.i.king@...il.com,
 u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com, andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com,
 lala.lin@...iatek.com, bchihi@...libre.com, wenst@...omium.org,
 fshao@...omium.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] thermal: mediatek: lvts: Add platform ops to support alternative conversion logic

Am 21. November 2025 14:00:29 MEZ schrieb AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>:
>Il 21/11/25 12:16, Laura Nao ha scritto:
>> Introduce lvts_platform_ops struct to support SoC-specific versions of
>> lvts_raw_to_temp() and lvts_temp_to_raw() conversion functions.
>> 
>> This is in preparation for supporting SoCs like MT8196/MT6991, which
>> require a different lvts_temp_to_raw() implementation.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Nao <laura.nao@...labora.com>
>
>Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>
>

Should this patch not have same prefix like the others?


regards Frank

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ